- Occupy Evething Except Jobs

Media Propaganda and Historical Amnesia of the Democrat Party

In the age of curated outrage and algorithmic headlines, propaganda no longer arrives on printed leaflets—it scrolls by in real time. Yet the tactics are not new. What today’s media calls “information management” is the same manipulation that Democrat administrations have practiced for over a century. The modern difference is scale: a digital megaphone powerful enough to rewrite not only today’s news but yesterday’s memory.

The American press once called itself the “fourth estate,” a guardian of liberty. But when aligned with power, it becomes something darker—a ministry of memory, deciding what the nation is allowed to recall. The Democrat Party, long experienced in that art, has turned media control into both shield and sword, rewriting its past sins and reframing current abuses as virtue.

From Control of the Press to Control of Perception

During the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and shut down over 200 newspapers critical of his administration. He justified it as wartime necessity. His allies in the press echoed that justification so thoroughly that few Americans today even know it happened. The pattern began: silence the dissenters, then let history forget.

Half a century later, Woodrow Wilson perfected the craft. His Committee on Public Information—a euphemism for a propaganda ministry—trained more than 175,000 “volunteer speakers” to shape public opinion and intimidate the press. Wilson jailed critics under the Sedition Act, including Socialist candidate Eugene V. Debs, who ran for president from prison. Yet Wilson’s reputation in most textbooks remains “progressive idealist.” Historical amnesia has been good to him.

Franklin Roosevelt continued the manipulation through radio. By shrinking broadcast licenses from three years to six months, his administration effectively forced networks to comply or lose their ability to broadcast. His newly minted FCC and politicized IRS audited and intimidated critics. Still, Roosevelt is remembered as the man who “saved democracy,” not the president who muzzled it.

The Press as Partner, Not Watchdog

In the mid-20th century, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson discovered that when the press becomes a partner, scandals stay hidden. Kennedy’s personal life, health issues, and foreign policy blunders were largely concealed by friendly editors who saw themselves as “protecting the image” of Camelot. Johnson went further—using the FBI, CIA, and IRS to spy on political rivals and civil rights leaders alike.

When journalists eventually exposed the abuses of Watergate, they called it the triumph of a free press. But few noticed that similar or worse violations under Democratic presidents had been quietly ignored for decades. Selective outrage had already become the norm.

By the time Barack Obama entered office, the partnership between government and media had become institutionalized. Reporters rotated between network desks and administration jobs. “Fact-checkers” became gatekeepers of narrative conformity. Under Obama’s Justice Department, Associated Press reporters were secretly surveilled, Fox News journalist James Rosen was targeted under the Espionage Act, and the New York Times had its communications seized—all while the same media minimized or excused the actions.

Digital Propaganda and the Death of Context

Today’s media landscape, driven by clicks and tribal loyalty, amplifies the same propaganda techniques with new tools. Social media companies act as unofficial arms of the Democratic establishment, deciding what constitutes “truth” or “harm.” The Disinformation Governance Board proposed by the Biden administration was not a new idea—it was Wilson’s propaganda bureau rebranded for the algorithmic era.

The Hunter Biden laptop story, the suppression of dissent during the pandemic, and the digital silencing of political opponents all share one pattern: information inconvenient to the narrative is labeled “misinformation.” Once censored, it disappears into the fog of digital amnesia. Later, when proven true, the retractions are whispered—or never printed at all.

The goal of modern propaganda is not to convince the public that lies are true; it is to convince them that truth is irrelevant. By flooding the zone with noise, the media cultivates exhaustion, making citizens too weary to remember. That is historical amnesia by design.

Selective Memory as Political Weapon

The Democrat Party’s history provides fertile ground for selective forgetting. It was the party of slavery, of segregation, of Jim Crow, of the Ku Klux Klan. It fought civil rights legislation for nearly a century before claiming credit for it. When those facts became inconvenient, they were quietly reassigned to “Southern conservatives” in the national narrative—a linguistic sleight of hand repeated in classrooms and cable news alike.

Even today, Democrats portray themselves as defenders of minorities, though their policies often perpetuate dependency and division. The same party that once used literacy tests now uses identity politics to determine who may speak and who must apologize. The medium has changed, but the mindset has not.

The Age of Narrative Management

In our time, information is not merely reported—it is curated, filtered, and emotionally engineered. Political strategists understand that people do not remember facts; they remember feelings. By controlling tone and framing, the media manufactures moral consent.

Consider the contrast: when a Republican questions an election, it’s called “a threat to democracy.” When Democrats contest results—as they did in 2000, 2004, and 2016—it’s called “defending democracy.” The language is identical; only the direction changes. That is not journalism. That is narrative management.

This asymmetry corrodes public trust more effectively than censorship ever could. Because propaganda in a free society must wear the mask of fairness, the modern press speaks in the tone of neutrality while executing the mission of a political campaign.

Conclusion: Remembering What We’re Told to Forget

The danger of propaganda is not only that it lies—but that it teaches people to forget. A society that forgets its past abuses will tolerate their return. The Democrat Party’s long record of using government to silence opponents, manipulate media, and distort history is not ancient history; it is present policy.

A free people cannot remain free if they allow others to decide what is remembered. The antidote to propaganda is not cynicism—it is memory. History must be remembered as it happened, not as it’s retold.

“Those who control the narrative control the nation. Those who remember truth control their own minds.”

The choice before America is not between left and right. It is between remembering and forgetting.

Categories: Politics, Media, History
Tags: Democrats, Propaganda, Media Bias, Historical Amnesia, Free Press, Narrative Control